One to three weeks
Source-claimed sleep timeline; not trial measured.

Protocol / Research Dosing Guide
A transparent blend reference separating clinic-blog schedules from evidence for the unstudied fixed combination.
This vendor-defined blend combines short-acting Mod GRF(1-29) with Ipamorelin. No controlled human or animal study of the fixed 1:1 mixture was identified, so component findings cannot establish blend efficacy or safety.
Why researchers care
Combined growth-hormone secretagogue research
Class
Fixed GHRH-analogue and ghrelin-receptor-agonist blend
Route reported
Subcutaneous use is source reported
Cycle length
12–16 weeks reported; not validated
Regulatory status
Research-use listing; not FDA approved
The supplied clinic blog reports 100–200 mcg of each component one to three times daily. Its numeric schedules and outcome timelines are uncited clinical-marketing claims, not trial parameters.
| Phase or study | Amount | Frequency / evidence |
|---|---|---|
| First 2–4 weeks | 100 mcg + 100 mcg once daily | Clinic-blog conservative pattern |
| Standard | 100–200 mcg of each | Two times daily; clinic-blog claim |
| Advanced | 200–300 mcg of each | Three times daily; clinic-blog claim |
No study validates the blend amount, 1:1 ratio, timing, frequency, cycle, rest period, same-syringe compatibility, or escalation.
Neutral research-material planning only. This does not establish an appropriate amount or route.
Research planning item
Exact labeled research vial
Research planning item
Measured diluent volume
Research planning item
U-100 measurement reference
Research planning item
Alcohol swabs
Research planning item
Appropriate sharps container
Research planning item
Written concentration label
Concentration
5 mg/mL
Draw volume
0.04 mL
U-100 units
4
Mathematical draws
50
Arithmetic only. The entered amount is not a recommendation and does not establish suitability.
The clinic blog recommends fasted windows; no blend trial validates this.
Source reported, not clinically established.
Clinic-blog pattern only.
No validated procedure exists.
| Route | Evidence context | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous | Clinic/community reported | No blend trial |
| Same syringe | Claimed compatible by supplied blog | No cited compatibility study |
| Oral or nasal | Not established | No exposure data |
| Separate components | Different evidence records | Not proof for fixed blend |
Routes and amounts are not interchangeable unless a verified study explicitly establishes a conversion.
| Measure | Finding | Evidence limit |
|---|---|---|
| Blend half-life | Not established | No combination PK study |
| CJC without DAC | About 30 minutes reported | Component estimate only |
| Ipamorelin pulse | Two to three hours reported | Component claim only |
| Interaction | Not established | No fixed-blend PK |
| Route | Amount | Frequency | Source | Human validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous blend | 100 mcg + 100 mcg | Once daily | Clinic-blog claim | No |
| Subcutaneous blend | 100–200 mcg each | Twice daily | Clinic-blog claim | No |
| Subcutaneous blend | 200–300 mcg each | Three times daily | Clinic-blog claim | No |
Published study values describe those studies. Community-reported values are not validated dosing recommendations.
Concentration: 5 mg/mL
| Entered amount | Volume | U-100 units |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2 mg | 0.04 mL | 4 units |
| 0.4 mg | 0.08 mL | 8 units |
| 0.6 mg | 0.12 mL | 12 units |
Reconstitution does not establish identity, purity, sterility, stability, or an appropriate amount.
Mod GRF(1-29) is intended to stimulate GHRH receptors.
Current status · verified September 15, 2026
Research-use listing; not FDA approved
This is an evidence-gap and precaution list, not an approved prescribing label.
Active or recent cancer
GH and IGF-1 pathway concern
Uncontrolled diabetes
Metabolic effects are uncertain
Pituitary or acromegaly disorder
Pathway-specific concern
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
No blend safety data
Concurrent medicines
No interaction studies
Tested athletes
GH secretagogues are prohibited
Important limitation: No blend incidence data.
Important limitation: Attributed to ghrelin signaling.
Important limitation: Causality uncertain.
Important limitation: No controlled incidence.
Important limitation: No blend study.
Important limitation: No follow-up evidence.
Source-claimed sleep timeline; not trial measured.
Source-claimed skin timeline; not trial measured.
Source-claimed body-composition timeline; not trial measured.
Four to eight weeks reported; no restart criteria are established.
| Claim | Evidence level | What research shows | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth-hormone pulse | Not established for blend | Mechanistic claim | No blend study |
| Sleep or recovery | Not established | Clinic-blog claim | No controlled evidence |
| Skin or body composition | Not established | Marketing timeline | No cited trial |
| Synergy | Not established | Two-pathway hypothesis | No interaction study |
No fixed-blend stability study was identified.
The source's 28–30 day refrigeration claim is not validated product stability evidence.
Compatibility and degradation of the mixture are not independently established.
Visual inspection cannot establish identity, purity, or sterility.
Confirm whether an amount means total blend or each component.
This blend uses the no-DAC form; schedules are not interchangeable.
Treat it as an uncited clinic-blog statement.
Do not describe the current batch as verified.
No validated missed-dose procedure exists.
| Compound | Class or mechanism | Evidence | FDA status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CJC no DAC + Ipamorelin | Two-pathway fixed blend | No direct studies | Not approved |
| CJC without DAC | Short-acting GHRH analogue | No direct protocol-scale trial | Not approved |
| Ipamorelin | Ghrelin-receptor agonist | Component research only | Not approved |
| CJC with DAC | Long-acting GHRH analogue | Early human PK/PD | Not this blend |
CJC-1295 without DAC and Ipamorelin in a vendor-defined mixture.
No controlled blend trial was identified.
No.
Not established.
No.
No.
The supplied blog claims it, but cites no compatibility study.
No; they are clinic-marketing claims.
No.
It calculates total-blend concentration and volume only.
Coverage source
Clinic-blog source for schedules and claims; no peer-reviewed blend citations provided.
Open direct sourceRelated-compound research
DAC-bearing component context only; does not test this blend.
Open direct sourceComponent human research
Component-only pharmacology; does not establish fixed-blend use.
Open direct source