Topical trial windows
Healing was assessed over 4 weeks in the first-in-man study and 13 weeks in Phase IIb.

Protocol / Research Dosing Guide
An evidence-organized LL-37 reference that keeps the published topical wound-gel trials separate from the injectable schedules circulated in research communities.
LL-37 is the only cathelicidin the human body produces. It disrupts microbial membranes and also works as an immune signal, which is why it can both defend against microbes and amplify inflammation. The important boundary on this page is route: every published human trial applied LL-37 as a gel on a venous leg ulcer. Nothing published tests it as an injection.
Why researchers care
Wound healing, antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity, immune signaling
Class
Human cathelicidin host-defense peptide, 37 amino acids, derived from hCAP-18
Route reported
Topical gel in published human trials; subcutaneous in community reports
Cycle length
2–4 week community blocks; no validated cycle for injection
Regulatory status
Not FDA approved; the synthetic drug candidate ropocamptide completed Phase IIb
The supplied source reports a community subcutaneous structure of roughly 100–250 mcg daily, with some write-ups citing up to 500 mcg, once daily and often five days per week for a two- to four-week block. It states plainly that no human trial supports the injectable route.
| Phase or study | Amount | Frequency / evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Community starting range | 100–200 mcg per day, subcutaneous | Community reported |
| Community upper range cited | Up to 500 mcg per day | Community reported |
| Community frequency | Once daily, often five days per week | Community reported |
| Community block length | 2–4 weeks, then a break | Community reported |
| Trial concentration | 0.5 mg/mL topical gel, twice weekly | Human trial |
| Trial concentration | 1.6 mg/mL topical gel, twice weekly | Human trial |
| Rest period for injection | Not established | Not established |
The two columns of evidence do not meet. Trial figures are wound-surface concentrations applied by clinical staff; the microgram figures are informal injectable practice with no trial behind them. In the trials the lowest concentration healed best, so higher is not better here.
Neutral research-material planning only. This does not establish an appropriate amount or route.
Research planning item
Exact labeled research vial
Research planning item
Bacteriostatic water at a measured volume
Research planning item
U-100 insulin syringes
Research planning item
Alcohol prep swabs
Research planning item
Sharps container
Research planning item
Refrigeration for the prepared vial
Research planning item
Written concentration label with the preparation date
Concentration
2.5 mg/mL
Draw volume
0.1 mL
U-100 units
10
Mathematical draws
20
Arithmetic only. The entered amount is not a recommendation and does not establish suitability.
Not established. No study compared times of day.
Community write-ups describe once daily, frequently five days on and two off. Trials dosed the gel twice weekly.
Not applicable to a topical or injected product.
No validated replacement procedure exists for the injectable route.
| Format | What is reported | Evidence limit |
|---|---|---|
| Topical gel | 0.5, 1.6 and (first-in-man only) 3.2 mg/mL, twice weekly on the ulcer | The only route with randomized human evidence |
| Subcutaneous | 100–500 mcg daily in community write-ups | No published human injection study |
| Oral | Not viable; digested before absorption | No exposure data |
| Route conversion | Not established | Wound-surface concentration cannot be converted into an injected amount |
Routes and amounts are not interchangeable unless a verified study explicitly establishes a conversion.
| Measure | Finding | Evidence limit |
|---|---|---|
| Human plasma half-life | Not established in the sources reviewed | Do not infer frequency |
| Local persistence in a wound | Not characterized as a published figure | Trials measured healing, not exposure |
| Solution stability | LL-37 is degraded by proteases in solution | Cold, short storage is the reported handling practice |
| Community daily frequency | Not derived from pharmacokinetics | Not established |
| Route | Amount | Frequency | Source | Human validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topical | 0.5 mg/mL | Twice weekly | Human trial | Best healing rate reported |
| Topical | 1.6 mg/mL | Twice weekly | Human trial | Effective but below the low concentration |
| Topical | 3.2 mg/mL | Twice weekly | First-in-man only | Not carried forward |
| Subcutaneous | 100–200 mcg | Once daily | Community report | No |
| Subcutaneous | Up to 500 mcg | Once daily | Community report | No |
Published study values describe those studies. Community-reported values are not validated dosing recommendations.
Concentration: 2.5 mg/mL
| Entered amount | Volume | U-100 units |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 mg | 0.1 mL | 10 units |
| 0.5 mg | 0.2 mL | 20 units |
| 0.75 mg | 0.3 mL | 30 units |
Reconstitution does not establish identity, purity, sterility, stability, or an appropriate amount.
LL-37 is cleaved from the precursor protein hCAP-18 and is the only human cathelicidin.
Current status · verified September 16, 2026
Not FDA approved; the synthetic drug candidate ropocamptide completed Phase IIb
This is an evidence-gap and precaution list, not an approved prescribing label.
Psoriasis, lupus or rosacea
LL-37 is implicated in the disease processes described in the literature
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
No safety data
People on immune-affecting medicines
No interaction data; requires clinician oversight
History of strong reactions to injected peptides
Mast-cell activation is a known LL-37 property
Children or adolescents
No established protocol
Expectation of treating systemic infection
No human evidence supports that use
Important limitation: Consistent with mast-cell histamine release.
Important limitation: Histamine-type response.
Important limitation: Based on disease-association research.
Important limitation: Applies to the gel on skin, not to injection.
Important limitation: No human safety database exists for injected LL-37.
Important limitation: No interaction studies.
Healing was assessed over 4 weeks in the first-in-man study and 13 weeks in Phase IIb.
Not established. Any promised week-by-week injectable result is unsupported.
Injection-site condition and any skin or inflammatory change.
Persistent or spreading local reactions.
| Claim | Evidence level | What research shows | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venous leg ulcer healing | Early human research | Two randomized topical trials | Topical route only |
| Antimicrobial activity | Laboratory | Membrane disruption and anti-biofilm work | No human infection outcome |
| Immune modulation | Preclinical | Signaling research | Direction of effect is context dependent |
| Systemic infection or Lyme disease | Not established | No human-trial support | Unsupported claim |
Freezer storage around -20 °C is the reported long-term condition.
Refrigerated at 2–8 °C and used promptly; LL-37 is susceptible to proteolytic degradation in solution.
Keep the vial out of light.
A clear, colorless solution is expected. Cloudiness or particles mean discard.
Discard it. Do not use a solution that is not clear.
This matches LL-37 mast-cell activity. Persistent reactions are a stop signal and warrant clinical review.
Use a smaller water volume for a more concentrated vial, then recheck the arithmetic.
The healing evidence is topical and does not transfer to injection.
No validated missed-amount procedure exists.
| Compound | Class or mechanism | Evidence | FDA status |
|---|---|---|---|
| LL-37 | Human cathelicidin host-defense peptide | Topical human trials | Antimicrobial: yes |
| BPC-157 | Soft-tissue recovery interest | Primarily preclinical | Antimicrobial: no |
| TB-500 | Tissue-repair interest | Primarily preclinical | Antimicrobial: no |
| KPV | Anti-inflammatory fragment interest | Primarily laboratory/preclinical | Antimicrobial: no |
The only cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide the human body makes, a 37-amino-acid host-defense peptide cut from hCAP-18.
No. The topical drug candidate ropocamptide completed Phase IIb but has not been approved or marketed.
A gel applied to venous leg ulcers twice weekly at 0.5 and 1.6 mg/mL, not an injection.
No. The 100–500 mcg daily figures are community reports.
There is no evidence that it does. The results belong to the topical, low-concentration setup.
Not established in the sources reviewed.
The trials reported the strongest healing rate at 0.5 mg/mL; the reason is not established, so more is not assumed to be better.
Mostly local: redness, swelling, itching or burning, consistent with mast-cell histamine release.
No human-trial evidence supports that.
Concentration and volume arithmetic only. It does not establish a dose.
Coverage source
Community subcutaneous structure, reconstitution math and page coverage; not primary evidence.
Open direct sourceHuman research
Randomized first-in-man topical study; lowest concentration healed best.
Open direct sourceHuman research
148-patient randomized topical trial over 13 weeks reporting safety and healing of large ulcers.
Open direct sourceLaboratory and review
Mechanism and disease-association context including psoriasis, lupus and rosacea.
Open direct source